ISCO C

36 papers

YearTitle / Authors
1995A meta model transformation approach towards harmonisation in information system modelling.
J. L. Han Oei
1995A self-descriptive conceptual schema modelling facility, its implementation and extension.
Michael Björn, Hyeon Kon Kim, Ryosuke Hotaka
1995A user-centered method for the development of data-intensive dialogue systems: an object-oriented approach.
Bettina Schewe, Klaus-Dieter Schewe
1995About a framework for information and information processing of learning systems.
Matthias Rauterberg
1995Abstraction and concretizing in information systems and problem domains: implications for system descriptions.
Jens Kaasbøll
1995Anything, everything and things playing roles: Three realizing principles as a contribution to a platform for understanding.
Paul Lindgreen
1995Business model representations.
Alex A. Verrijn-Stuart
1995Comments on "A meta model transformation approach towards harmonisation in information system modelling" by J. L. H. Oei.
Udo W. Lipeck
1995Comments on "A user-centered method for the development of data-intensive dialogue systems: an object-oriented approach" by B. Schewe and K.-D. Schewe.
Rudi Studer
1995Comments on "About a framework for information and information processing of learning systems" by M. Rauterberg.
Alex A. Verrijn-Stuart
1995Comments on "Anything, everything and things playing roles: Three realizing principles as a contribution to a platform for understanding" by P. Lindgreen.
James Odell
1995Comments on "Business model representations" by A. A. Verrijn-Stuart.
Roland Traunmüller
1995Comments on "Defining quality aspects for conceptual models" by J. Krogstie, O. I. Lindland and G. Sindre.
Pentti Kerola
1995Comments on "English grammar as a sentence model for conceptual modelling using NIAM" by J. A. Sykes.
Ryosuke Hotaka
1995Comments on "How should business professionals analyze information systems for themselves?" by S. L. Alter.
Pentti Kerola
1995Comments on "Multiple relationships: an analysis of their semantics and their modelling" by D. J. Flynn, D. R. Knight and A. H. F. Laender.
Wolfgang Hesse
1995Comments on "Semiotic approach for object abstraction" by B. A. Calway.
Ronald K. Stamper
1995Comments on "The discipline of information systems: Let many flowers bloom!" by D. E. Avison and J. Nandhakumar.
Klaus Voss
1995Comments on "Theories of meaning and different perspectives on information systems" by P. Holm and K. Karlgren.
Ronald K. Stamper
1995Comments on "What's in a relationship? On distinguishing property holding and object binding" by S. Kelly.
Heinrich C. Mayr
1995Defining quality aspects for conceptual models.
John Krogstie, Odd Ivar Lindland, Guttorm Sindre
1995English grammar as a sentence model for conceptual modelling using NIAM.
James A. Sykes
1995From information systems to knowledge systems.
Gerd Wagner
1995How far Harmonisation? (Panel discussion set-up).
Eckhard D. Falkenberg
1995How should business professionals analyze information systems for themselves?
Steven Alter
1995Information System Concepts: Towards a Consolidation of Views, Proceedings of the IFIP International Working Conference on Information System Concepts (ISCO 1995), Marburg, Germany, 28-30 March 1995
Eckhard D. Falkenberg, Wolfgang Hesse, Antoni Olivé
1995Limitations of information systems theory and practice: a case for pluralism.
Chrisanthi Avgerou, Tony Cornford
1995Multiple relationships: an analysis of their semantics and their modelling.
Donal J. Flynn, David R. Knight, Alberto H. F. Laender
1995Position paper on "How far harmonisation?".
James Odell
1995Position paper on "How far harmonisation?".
Ryosuke Hotaka
1995Position paper on "How far harmonisation?".
Arne Sølvberg
1995Position paper on "How far harmonisation?": Information system modelling myopia.
Ronald K. Stamper
1995Semiotic approach for object abstraction.
Bruce A. Calway
1995The discipline of information systems: Let many flowers bloom!
David E. Avison, Joe Nandhakumar
1995Theories of meaning and different perspectives on information systems.
Peter Holm, Klas Karlgren
1995What's in a relationship? On distinguishing property holding and object binding.
Steven Kelly