| 2009 | A next step towards automated modelling of sources of law. Emile de Maat, Radboud Winkels |
| 2009 | A proposal for evidential reasoning about motives. Floris Bex, Katie Atkinson |
| 2009 | Abstract specification of legal contracts. Cristian Prisacariu, Gerardo Schneider |
| 2009 | Analyzing a complaint database by means of a genetic-based data mining algorithm. Jan van Dijk, Sunil Choenni, Frans Leeuw |
| 2009 | Argumentation mining: the detection, classification and structure of arguments in text. Raquel Mochales Palau, Marie-Francine Moens |
| 2009 | Case law in extended argumentation frameworks. Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon, Sanjay Modgil |
| 2009 | Coherence-driven argumentation to norm consensus. Sindhu Joseph, Henry Prakken |
| 2009 | Creating an argumentation corpus: do theories apply to real arguments?: a case study on the legal argumentation of the ECHR. Raquel Mochales Palau, Aagje Ieven |
| 2009 | Evidence transmutations: gathering admissible evidence using belief revision. Mary-Anne Williams |
| 2009 | Formalising dynamic protocols for open agent systems. Alexander Artikis |
| 2009 | How much logical structure is helpful in content-based argumentation software for legal case solving? Stijn Colen, Fokie Cnossen, Bart Verheij |
| 2009 | How to capture and use legal patterns in IT. Alzbeta Krausová, Fabio Massacci, Ayda Saïdane |
| 2009 | Human-aided computer cognition for e-discovery. Christopher Hogan, Robert S. Bauer, Dan Brassil |
| 2009 | Improving the comprehension of legal documentation: the case of patent claims. Nadjet Bouayad-Agha, Gerard Casamayor, Gabriela Ferraro, Simon Mille, Vanesa Vidal, Leo Wanner |
| 2009 | Incorporating issues of fairness into development of a multi-agent negotiation support system. John Zeleznikow, Brooke Abrahams |
| 2009 | Integrating induction and deduction for finding evidence of discrimination. Dino Pedreschi, Salvatore Ruggieri, Franco Turini |
| 2009 | Intelligent hybrid approach to false identity detection. Tossapon Boongoen, Qiang Shen |
| 2009 | Isomorphism and argumentation. Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon, Thomas F. Gordon |
| 2009 | Law as a seamless web?: comparison of various network representations of the United States Supreme Court corpus (1791-2005). Michael J. Bommarito II, Daniel Martin Katz, Jon Zelner |
| 2009 | Legal metadata interchange framework to match CEN metalex. Monica Palmirani, Luca Cervone, Fabio Vitali |
| 2009 | Legal reasoning with argumentation schemes. Thomas F. Gordon, Douglas Walton |
| 2009 | Legal text analysis of the modification provisions: a pattern oriented approach. Raffaella Brighi, Monica Palmirani |
| 2009 | Modular argumentation for modelling legal doctrines of performance relief. Phan Minh Dung, Phan Minh Thang, Nguyen Duy Hung |
| 2009 | NLP-based extraction of modificatory provisions semantics. Alessandro Mazzei, Daniele Paolo Radicioni, Raffaella Brighi |
| 2009 | NLP-based metadata extraction for legal text consolidation. Pier-Luigi Spinosa, Gerardo Giardiello, Manola Cherubini, Simone Marchi, Giulia Venturi, Simonetta Montemagni |
| 2009 | Ontological requirements for analogical, teleological, and hypothetical legal reasoning. Kevin D. Ashley |
| 2009 | Plausibility schemas: templates for legal factfinding. Vern R. Walker |
| 2009 | Query-based opinion summarization for legal blog entries. Jack G. Conrad, Jochen L. Leidner, Frank Schilder, Ravi Kondadadi |
| 2009 | Reasoning with spatial plans on the semantic web. Rinke Hoekstra, Radboud Winkels, Erik Hupkes |
| 2009 | Segmentation of legal documents. Eneldo Loza Mencía |
| 2009 | Supporting of legal reasoning for cases which are not strictly regulated by law. Tomasz Zurek, Emil Kruk |
| 2009 | The 12th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, Proceedings of the Conference, June 8-12, 2009, Barcelona, Spain |
| 2009 | The network of French legal codes. Pierre Mazzega, Danièle Bourcier, Romain Boulet |
| 2009 | Toward a general theory of document modeling. Marc Lauritsen, Thomas F. Gordon |
| 2009 | Toward assessing law students' argument diagrams. Collin F. Lynch, Kevin D. Ashley, Niels Pinkwart, Vincent Aleven |
| 2009 | Using critical questions to disambiguate and formalize statutory provisions. Matthias Grabmair, Kevin D. Ashley |
| 2009 | Why lawyers are nice (or nasty): a game-theoretical argumentation exercise. Giovanni Sartor, Michel Rudnianski, Antonino Rotolo, Régis Riveret, Eunate Mayor |
| 2009 | e-dossier at the Dutch Council of State: design, implementation and lessons learned. R. A. Hilhorst, Tom M. van Engers |